Michelle,
I saw the same thing. My presumption is that there are a couple missing zeros.
Either that or they get their reading before the light gets sent befause the instruments are light-based. <g>
I remember during the VFP 2.0 beta when Rushmore would report negative numbers. <g> The truth of the whole matter here is probably that Rushmore is the cause of all of this. <g>
Best,
DD
>I'm no scientist, but this isn't making sense to me...
>
>It takes 0.2 nanoseconds through a vacuum, but through their chamber, it taks 62 nanoseconds _less_ than that? So it takes -61.8 nanoseconds? What am I missing?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Michelle
>
>
>>Folks,
>>
>>Thought you might find this interesting:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/000719/nj_nec_sup.html>>
>>Best,
>>
>>DD
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.
