Craig,
Actually I think that was trans-warp... <g>
Best,
DD
PS - How're the eyeballs?
>If I recall correctly, in Star Trek, warp drive was faster than the speed of light. Now we know how it works.
>
>>I'm no scientist, but this isn't making sense to me...
>>
>>It takes 0.2 nanoseconds through a vacuum, but through their chamber, it taks 62 nanoseconds _less_ than that? So it takes -61.8 nanoseconds? What am I missing?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>
>>Michelle
>>
>>
>>>Folks,
>>>
>>>Thought you might find this interesting:
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/000719/nj_nec_sup.html>>>
>>>Best,
>>>
>>>DD
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.
