Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
@*!! Why does Referential Integrity bother with deleted
Message
De
26/07/2000 12:47:30
 
 
À
26/07/2000 12:45:02
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
Divers
Thread ID:
00397085
Message ID:
00397130
Vues:
13
>Thanks Ed
>
>I have been using surrogate keys for a while now and as you say my earlier problems have stopped happening, however my point was why did they bother to do it this way in the first place.

The concept of deletion not physically removing a record from the table until a PACK occurs is a carryover from the original xBASE language and table construct; removing it would alter backwards compatibility, and would render the RECALL statement useless.
EMail: EdR@edrauh.com
"See, the sun is going down..."
"No, the horizon is moving up!"
- Firesign Theater


NT and Win2K FAQ .. cWashington WSH/ADSI/WMI site
MS WSH site ........... WSH FAQ Site
Wrox Press .............. Win32 Scripting Journal
eSolutions Services, LLC

The Surgeon General has determined that prolonged exposure to the Windows Script Host may be addictive to laboratory mice and codemonkeys
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform