>
>· Scripting - This is one clear advantage AFP has over WWWC. It allows scripting within a HTML page (with the extension of .AFP) like ASP scripting. But for this, there is no program or utility, which can be used to test & debug directly the AFP script. Also the error message displayed in the browser when a command fails is not much useful. Web Connection supports scripting to a certain extent via Templates. Web Connection even supports some debugging support if you run compiled scripts in which case you can step into scripts with the debugger.
>

What's the difference between AFP and WC's .wcs scripts that make AFP better? I can't think of anything that's missing from .wcs scripts (which are different than WC templates).