Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Light Faster then Light
Message
De
27/07/2000 16:48:12
 
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Autre
Divers
Thread ID:
00394557
Message ID:
00397883
Vues:
39
Jerry,

That's what I was going to say. <g>

Best,

DD

>>PMJI but complex systems can be created by simpler systems without any guidance. It's happening all the time. Typically it just requires some energy input, eg the sun shining on the earth, power going into a computer.
>>You really need to read the classic "The Blind Watchmaker" by Richard Dawkins, although it's not a book I imagine you will enjoy.
>
>If by complex you mean more ordered, then not really. The Second Law states that NO system can, of itself, decrease it's entropy without a correspondingly GREATER increase in entropy someplace else. (The Entropy of the Universe ALWAYS increases). That is why no one can site an example of uncontrolled energy input causing a building to errupt out of a forest fire.
>Besides, Stephen J Gould and Elderidge ('Punk Eeeks") destroyed "biology's nasty little secret" with their Punctuated Equilibrium theory, admitting the the geologic record does not support Darwin's theory of gradualism ("Cladists") during which hundreds of thousands of intermediate forms should be successively layered upon prior intermediate forms.
>So, now, depending on which camp you are in, Evolution gradually transpired over 100's of milions of years or there were long period of stasis with short periods of time where numbers and varieties of life appeared explosively. Supposedly The Cambrian Period, for example. Gould has Evolution occuring in a time span as short as 5,000 to 50,000 years, which is anti-thesis to Darwin and Dawkins.
>I've also been following the Michael Behe episode for awhile now. Failing to refute his thesis and examples in a professional manner with their reputation riding on their printed word, opponents resorted to sending in lesser lights to engage in personal and insulting attacks, reducing themselves to the status of howler monkeys.
>Evolution is not taking place now or adherents would be showing reproducible laboratory experiments proving such, especially if it could take place in the time span Gould suggests. The much touted Pepper Moth is only proof that genes for dark and light colored moths exist coexist in the same gene pool and the relative percentages of living specimens can be reversed by the fortunes of burning coal or not. No 'evolution' took place.
>A large group of biologists, for essentially political and personal reasons have embarked on a road traveled by Lysenko during the early part of the last century, with nearly the samearrogant ruthlessness.
>
>>
>>
>>>Michael,
>>>
>>>That's why atheism seems so dumb to me. And extremely arrogant as well. Imagine... The finite declaring that the infinite does not exist.. The small declaring that there is no large. <g> It also argues agains evolution since it would then argue that a less complex mechanism is capable of creating a more complex mechanism. The interesting thng is that less complex mechanisms are able to create more complex mechanisms (just look at any machine shop to see this) but they cannot so do without an outside intelligence directing things. Evolutionists want the less-->more results but without one of the necessary ingredients - directed intelligence.
>>>
>>>Agnosticism I can understand, and I think many confuse the two, but really....
>>>
>>>I have heard that one human brain contains more "electrical" connections than all the computers in the world, and I tend to believe that is a true statement. Even then we don't use but a portion of what is available.
>>>
>>>Best,
>>>
>>>DD
>>>
>>>>I agree with you.
>>>>
>>>>Complexity/computational theory strongly suggests that a system cannot compute anything beyond it's own inherent complexity. Put in terms of people, it is impossible to understand anything that is intrinsically more complex than our own brain. There will always be things that we do not, & cannot, understand. Maybe, if we are lucky & evolution moves us in the right direction, our brains may become more complex allowing us a greater insight to the universe & the interactions of all within it. That is, if those who believe they understand everything now don't destroy us first.
Best,


DD

A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.
Précédent
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform