>>Did you get the same results as I did?
>
>Yes, exactly the same results. Then, when I played with it a bit, I saw that that string was messing up memory in other locations as well. Wierd.

It looks like we'd be better off building the string like follows.

lcString = lcString + "one"
lcString = lcString + "two"

or does that make a difference as far as messing with the memory?