And you can easily see that my knowledge is lacking and I totally missed it!

Well, it's all working now, and I've learned a few more things, thanks to you and Jim. ;-)


>It was a bad attempt at humor, Cindy :-)
>
>Jim is right. Use RemoveObject.
>
>>Would that be RemoveObject first, then destroy? Does that safely get rid of everything so I don't have "dangling object references?"