Carlo,
I'm with Barbara... Windows 2000 is much more stsble. I would also do a 'clean' install as well.
One thing about W2K as well as NT. They are/were a little more 'touchy' about using the proper hardware as suggested on the Hardware Compatibility List.
Best,
DD
>Hi all,
>
>I´m a little bored, with the unstable W98, for example I hit Enter and close my eyes and then open to see if the monitor is still there <s>.
>This nonsenses are for asking this:
>Is it a good idea install W2000 ?
>Is it more stable than W98 ?
>Is it stable at all ?
>VFP works without any trouble there ?
>Is there something I have to take in mind to do this upgrade ?
>Can I let my actual disk with W98 and Install another with W2000 and boot from one or another without any troubles ?
>
>I ask this to all of you that works with W2000.
>
>Thanks for what you can say to me.
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.