>>I second on that :) I can't think of any newborn section that would like to see a baby as 72 days old on 03/01/2000 when s/he was born on 02/29/2000 with a one liner :)
>
>Right, that's exactly the kind of situation where it makes a difference, just like Cindy said elsewhere in this thread.
>
>BTW, where have you been? Haven't seen much of you around here for a while.
I was busy with some projects and some other problems.
Cetin
