>John,
>
>Could you give definitions of implementation vs interface inheritance, perhaps with VFP example.
>
>TIA,
>Ken
>
>><<
>>Components that you can't currently take full advantage of with VFP because they require Implementation Inheritance
>><<
>>
>>This statement is not quite correct.
>>
>>COM + events require the ability to DEFINE AND IMPLEMENT INTERFACES. COM + events are about INTERFACE INHERITANCE, not implementation inheritance.

Difficult to do, since VFP doesn't support interface inheritance. The best example I can think of is that implementation inheritance is what we have now, where we get all the code with the subclass. With interface inheritance we only get the interface (the methods and parameters).