I would also like a compile switch that would create a custom runtime for the exe (stripping out all the unused stuff) or creating a (gasp) stand alone EXE.
>Yeah...but, then again, maybe what we're talking about is reducing an EXE from, maybe, 800K to 500K but still requiring 6MB runtimes.
>
>>>I've also heard arguments made (that I agree with) calling for a more compact version of the VFP runtimes that tosses out all backward-compatible stuff (you know, the stuff that when you look in the Help file says "For backward compatibility, use XXXX instead").
>>
>>Or a compile time switch that allows this.
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only