>>I didn't know that, but then again I'm going to guess that this will be worse than using a macro in terms of performance.
>
>I'll bet you $25 that () is at least twice as fast as & in this situation.

Careful, Mike. EVAL is only about 10% faster when referencing an Object's property vs. using a macro.

oObject.&cProp = value

STORE value TO EVAL("oObject."+cProp)

If it's a straight EVAL() vs. macro for an ordinary variable, you're correct. It is still faster, though.