>>It's a "feature" if it's in the documentation, and a "bug" if it's not. HTH!
>
>Well... sometimes we've got features that aren't in the docs, call "Undocumented -Features". And sometimes, when a feature is in the docs, but doesn't actually work, I affectionatly call them "Documented-UnFeatures" :-)

Then logically we must also have "undocumented-unfeatures". Would that be a bug(s) that MS doesn't know about? :-)