>>Well, you're comparing things as they are now, not as they were then.
>
>Ahhhhh, Ok, "At the time" was a while ago... I gotcha , my bad.

And it's still around.

>>Mike, Mike, Mike, the OS has zero to do with it. OOP is a development paradigm.
>
>I know. But I watched Steve Jobs' first look at Mac 10, and he said that the new Mac will support OO programs. Which I took to mean, thats how controlling and inflexible the Mac OS is. I shoudl find that video again just to make sure I wasn't halloucinating that.

I really am not familar with the video, so I don't know. However, he could've meant that internally the OS will expose some objects, like Win32 does with some things, or have something similar to the MFC. I can't say.