Doh! Of course, you are right!

>Naw, Gonz, close but not quite. We work with computers remember? And the values can be more efficiently stored as bits in a 32 bit integer. Therefore, the numbering should be...
>
>>For this to "work", we have to renumber the choices....see, this way we can define ourselves as belonging to more than 1, like I would say I'm a 107, that is, (1+10+96)
>>
>>
>hacker (HACK-uhr) noun
>
> 1. A person who enjoys exploring the details of programmable systems
> and how to stretch their capabilities, as opposed to most users, who
> prefer to learn only the minimum necessary.
>
> 2. One who programs enthusiastically (even obsessively) or who enjoys
> programming rather than just theorizing about programming.
>
> 4. A person capable of appreciating hack value.
>
> 8. A person who is good at programming quickly.
>
> 16. An expert at a particular program, or one who frequently does work
> using it or on it; as in `a Unix hacker'.
> (Definitions 1 through 5 are correlated, and people who fit them
> congregate.)
>
> 32. An expert or enthusiast of any kind. One might be an astronomy
> hacker, for example.
>
> 64. One who enjoys the intellectual challenge of creatively overcoming
> or circumventing limitations.
>
> 128. [deprecated] A malicious meddler who tries to discover sensitive
> information by poking around. Hence `password hacker', `network
> hacker'. The correct term for this sense is cracker.
>
>And you're a 39.:-)