>Let's say there are 10 people on the VFP team and VFP makes $10 Million annually. Now, lets say there are 100 people on the VB team and VB makes $50 Million annually.
>
>On a per-capita basis, VFP's rev is 2x that of VB. In the aggregate, VB's rev is 5x that of VFP.
>
>Which one would you take????

So, 100 people on the VFP team = $100 Million. Doesn't that mean VFP is more profitable? Using just those numbers, I would think it makes better sense to lose the product with the lower ROI and increase sales of the one with higher ROI.