I was pointing out that you can't use "amount of revenue" as the only deciding factor. In that example, VFP generates more income from the cost required to procuce it, than VB does.

Which would I take? For Cash in hand VB hands down. But, if over a short period (2-3 years), you could replace VB with VFP I would choose VFP. In the long run, it would generate more income for less cost.

But, who knows what those numbers really are and what the cost to make that switch would be? Not me. < g >


>Who is talking about ROI? Giving the fact you did not suffix your post with a
>< g >, I am going to assume your post was serious, not a joke. Or, am I mistaken...???

>>
>So, 100 people on the VFP team = $100 Million. Doesn't that mean VFP is more profitable? Using just those numbers, I would think it makes better sense to lose the product with the lower ROI and increase sales of the one with higher ROI.
><