>Doug,
>
>>For me, it all boils down to taking care of the client - even those who may not have the resources to spend for an extra SQL server right now. For these folks I'll 'make do' and give them a well designed app that can more easily migrate to a more robust backend when they (the client) are able.
>
>It's good to remember in these discussions, that it's not "one size fits all" related to physical implementation decisions.
David,
Exactly!
I find it more than a little ironic that those who criticize those who state the above (including VFP as a viable alternative) as being myopic and state that by virtue of keeping that alternative that there is a general VFP-based myopia, are so prone to offer just another myopic alternative.
<g>
I guess fickleness isn't as rare as I once thought. <g>
Best,
DD
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.