>Compiling to the CLR would come with costs- as you know VB.NET completely breaks backward compatibility. I don't think that the VFP community wants this.
Peronally, I am ready for it.
>I think that they are being diplomatic, and waiting for us to decide ourselves that we really don't want it.
I hope not.
>After all- if you want a language that looks/acts/works like VB, why aren't you using VB?
No offense, but I think this is a completely faulty assumption. VC++, C# and VB will not look/act/work the same under CLR. VB do points well, VC++ will be difficult to use...
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only