>There are already "two versions" of VFP in the sense that you have a limited-syntax version for compiling MTDLL's.

Er... in a sense, yes.

>A more Fox-ish way of approaching it would be to make it a compile option, giving us extreme flexibility, IMO.

I bet we would see a VFP syntax to VB.NET syntax before we see this... hehe. But then, predicting what MS will do next has never been my strength. :-)