>George,
>
>So, are you saying that we are not as close as we think? < bg > I know that the work on MS part is not trivial for MS. I'm only pointing out that the tough work lies on MS. Further, many issues like this are OS issues, and would exist even if VFP remained 32-bit.

That's probably a fair statement. I don't want to put words in Calvin's mouth, so what I'm saying is strictly my take. On the MS end there's tons to do. This is consistent with a statement I've made many times in the past that, "...porting to a 64 bit OS is not a simple re-compile, but a re-design" (or words to this effect).

For us, as long as we didn't use anything that originally included for backward compatibility, the problems are no where near as complex. It may be an oversimplification, but it may in some instances be as simple as a re-compile under the new OS and installing the new runtimes. I can say with some degree of assuredness, that it'll be nothing like moving from FPW to VFP (but that should be pretty obvious).