I was thinking the same thing. IMO, I believe this would be the best approach. Everyone who is interested could participate and hopefully also get participation from MS. I especially hope all those who complain that MS always ignores their suggestions and wishes see this as an open and sincere invitation from MS and participate as well. Even those who are cynical about the invitation need to put that aside. You can never get to Yes if you never ask.

>Perhaps a set of pages over on the Wiki might be appropriate for this. You could have a page for discussion of various possible directions for the next version (CLR, CE, 64-bit, etc), where people could input their pros and cons of each, and Robert and others representing Microsoft could comment or clarify various technical points being discussed.
>
>Then, perhaps over time, as the more complete ramifications of each option are better understood, pages could be developed with position statements that people could sign their name to, giving an indication of who is "voting" for what. That editable nature of the wiki would then allow you to change your position and move your name around as you get better acquainted with each option.
>
>I think the wiki is best suited for this kind of thing, since it is document-centric.
>
>What do you think?