>I love all the bad press that VFP gets. All the scared programmers
>running to weaker, less flexible DBMS's. More work for me! I love it.
>;-)
>
>Seriously though, I think VFP kicks tail for data delivery, and
>improvements are made regularly. VFP marketed itself last year without any
>help from the MS machine and now MS has seen the light and has finally
>begun to put marketing dollars behind VFP, which is, if not its best, one
>of its best development platforms. As developers, it then becomes our
>responsibility to show all these nay-sayers what VFP can really do. I'm up
>for challenge...and excited about it.
>
I'm excited about it too!
I'd like to remember where I saw that challenge that Les Pinter
put out in public to pit himself with VFP5 against any other so-
called database development tool. He made it sweet by making
a stipulation that the database would have at least 100,000
records in it.
That'll choke every other desktop database tool compared with
what VFP can do with it.
==Carl
Carl J. WarnerVFUG OfficerThe early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.