Exactly. That is what I meant in the first place.

>So, it follows, I am advocating against a "fools rush in" approach.
>
>>>>You are advocating the "fools rush in" approach, but to high tech "he who hesitates is lost" is often more appropriate. Some examples:
>>>
>>>Hello! Where did you get that from? I'm definitely not in "fools rush in" mode for the CLR; quite the opposite.
>>
>>I meant that you are saying it is foolish to rush this decision.