>>>Matt,
>>>
>>>From what I know from the documentation, the less you 'SET' the better the performance. I specifically remember this about ORDER. I also suspect that rushmore exclusively recognizes .CDX, and simply disregards .IDX. In fact, if you want to increase performance, and robustness to a certain extent, I'd advise to changed the .IDX into .CDX tags.
>>>
>>>HTH,
>>>
>>>Marc
>>
>>
>>Agreed, and done...to a certain degree. Legacy app. Some optimization was done by adding CDX's, but the old IDX's must be supported or else a major fix is necessary and we're rewriting it in 5.0 anyway (it's a FPD2.5 now)
>>
>>Thanks for the clarification on the SETs. Perhaps I was confused by the use of IDX's in some of the older apps I've worked on.
>>
>>Matt
>Matt,
>
>IDX's are used by Rushmore if they are already open when the table was used. Any index with a FOR clasue is NOT used by rushmore at all.
>
>SET RELATION has little or no affect on SQL, it may speed itn up because the SQL engine will do a USE AGAIN instead of a USE which is slightly faster.
But in this case is not the relation the one who speeds things up, but the fact the tables are already opened, isn't it?
Vlad
Previous
Next
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only