>Well, I'm not really judging anything. (Fast or slow :)) BTW, I'm not the one to judge... :)
>
>But I'm thinking like that:
>UT is one of the most public FoxPro places and lots of peoples express their concerns about VFP future here. There are several messages in this thread asking to give feed back to MS. IMHO, this thread is kind a feedback, isn't it? And it is not in a more or less obscure magazine, peer-to-peer discussion, etc.
>
>In the same time, UT is monitored by MS, as it should be. It doesn't matter the reason. And there's no feed back from MS.
>
>So, I'm asking my self: is this the answer? Are we still waiting something official or are we already happy with what we have (or don't have)?

Your point is all shared by the people of this forum. I think we all t hink the same on this. This is why 2 weeks ago I started to be more involved with MS people and exchanged a few emails with them. I also asked them to state the actual position of VFP 6 because it was a common question on the Universal Thread and that it is about time we have a statement coming from the top.

Again, we have several people from MS who surf this site. I know that the ones from the MVP program are doing a regular visit. But, all they can do is to forward our requests to the development team because they are 2 differents departments.

I heard that they are working hard on VFP 6 so this might be a reason why it's going slowly on this. Also DevCon is coming and the testing stage as well.

I can tell you what I know but not why I don't. :) And, when I say that I am waiting for a statement, yeah, it is. :)