>>To tell the truth, I've never tried hacking a VCX to have a subclassed header. But maybe if you did, and added a builder property, it would work.
>
>I do this all the time for my TaxHeader class. Besides this, I frequently hack the forms, enter TaxHeader in class and fill the classlocation for every header in it, so my grids are populated with my own headerclass.
I made a simple routine to fix all default headers in VCX/SCX to my own class, that is quite way more easy that manually fix this.
>Though I would be able to write a builder for this, I'm way to lazy to build such a thing. Why do things the hard way ;-) ?
I'm lazy for that too ;) However, sometimes it is needed, just because it improves ussability of your classes by other developers (good documenting helps here too conquering builders ;). Of course, when this class used only by you, you don't need builder for that ;)
Vlad Grynchyshyn, Project Manager, MCP
vgryn@yahoo.comICQ #10709245
The professional level of programmer could be determined by level of stupidity of his/her bugs
It is not appropriate to say that question is "foolish". There could be only foolish answers. Everybody passed period of time when knows nothing about something.