> Furthermore, it could be started and stopped, whereas the RV-based version tried to bring down the entire result set when trying to do an update (even if opened NODATA).

Really? I have never heard of this.

>
>I will be the first to admit that the RV's in either app may not have been properly constructed; time pressures on getting the first app running were incredible. As for the second app - well, once I was able to show that the SPT version was faster, I stopped fooling with RV's.
>
>Anyway, that's just my experience.

Thanks for relaying.