Charlie
>>Using RV's requires permissions on tables. So, how would you stop someone who knows their password from running a delete statement against a table using an ad-hoc query program?<<
That's like saying, "To get into your house you need a key. How will you stop the burglar getting in if he has a key?" Well, you do your best to make sure he doesn't have the key. That a burglar with a key can get in is not an argument against locks, it is a management failure. Such failures are not exclusive to RVs.
>>I'm using SP's for all action queries. Each table in the database automatically gets its own set of update, insert, delete and select SP's. Moving this kind of code into SP's, IMO helps organize application development.<<
Perhaps. Question: if I have a table with 100 fields including 5 memo fields with big text strings and 2 general fields with (say) word documents in them, and all these need to be updateable as required... with RVs only the changed ones will be updated. With a SP, can you tell me how you will use SP to organise it more easily than using a Tableupdate() command and having it "just happen"?
Regards
JR
"... They ne'er cared for us
yet: suffer us to famish, and their store-houses
crammed with grain; make edicts for usury, to
support usurers; repeal daily any wholesome act
established against the rich, and provide more
piercing statutes daily, to chain up and restrain
the poor. If the wars eat us not up, they will; and
there's all the love they bear us."
-- Shakespeare: Coriolanus, Act 1, scene 1