Don't extend my critisims of RV's to VFP as a whole. you do this often. Here is one example:

>
Ignored? Hardly. But your criticism of VFP because RVs "allow delete *" and all the rest of it, *is* simply incorrect. You acknowledge that remote security is a backend concern. Then you act as if backend security booboo's only affect
RVs. It's silly.
>

Here is another

>I'm pursuing your claim that VFP is "lousy".


Since you cannot stay on point, I am ending this conversation..