>Sorry for re-hashing what has been talked to death but I have not been albe to check UT much of late.
>
>1. Is VFP going to be part of the CLR?
>
>2. If we are not going to be in the CLR are we bothered about it?
>
>Some earlier threads I looked at seemed to be saying that the CLR implementation of VB is going to be pretty close to what we are used to in VFP anyway.

Check out the chat log from Jim Booth's "What does Dot Net mean to me" on the Wiki. This was talked about.

Basically the current standing is:

1. No we aren't in VFP 7. It hasn't been decided yet for future releases.
2. The log has some good reasons why we shouldn't be bothered with it. Personally, I'm not bothered by it because I believe we will lose too much in VFP if it were to conform. I'll need to learn a CLR compliant language to stay current but that doesn't bother me.