>>I wrote:
>>Interesting... so you are against the death penalty?
>>
>>You wrote:
>>Only if the laws were changed to life with absolutely no chance for parole [snip]
>>
>>I wrote:
>>But if the laws are not changed, then you still support the possibility of executing an innocent person?
>>
>>You wrote:
>>That is a ridiculous interpretation. We must enforce the laws we have or risk living in a state of anarchy. If laws are wrong, then we 2 avenues for change - legislatively or trust the courts to strike down those that are unconstitutional.
>>
>>What exactly have I misinterpreted?
>
>The assertion that I support the possibility of executing an innocent person just because I believe all our laws are to be followed even the death penalty is a ridiculous interpretaion. Let's step down a level and assert that you support the possibility of wrongful imprisonment of an innocent person just because you support the faithful execution of all child molestation laws. That, too, is a ridiculous interpretation.

If you support the death penalty when there is not the possibility of life without parole, and you agree there is the possibility an innocent person can be sentenced to death...

And I do support the fact that an innocent person can be imprisoned in any case, including a child molestation case. I realize that our justice system is not perfect, and that is exactly my point.