>>i'm afraid to ask, but why would you need to create
>> a copy of the object at runtime???
>
>Now *that's* ominous. Makes me wonder if I'm being
>daft, I don't think so.
>
>We're using non-visual "business objects", classes
>that represent our business data, seems sensible.
>
>So, rather than stuff form controls with values
>in the init method, we point the datasources of the
>controls directly into the object, still sensible?
>
>That means, for example, it would be very nice to
>have a copy so that "abort" can put the object back
>the way it was before the form was instantiated.
>
>What d'you think? No, honestly please (but gently
>of course :-) )

Mark

Excuse me for butting in but... Curiousity, are you using Objects as Business rules or something like Free Tables to store them in.

Thanks
Tom