>George,
>
>I think compile might be smart enough to "fix" things up. I haven't put it through a rigorous test though.
>
>I don't know how you got truncated stuff in there, I suppose it was just a function of what hosed it in the first place.

Dave,

This thing has me so curious that I saved the bad copy. When I get a chance, I'm going through the entire memo field (it's pretty big) to see if anything looks "funny", comparing it to what I see in another copy's method window. It appears that after a certain point (about a dozen methods deep) things get skewed.

>>That raises several questions. 1. Why, then, would a compile resolve it? 2. Why would it show a part of a reserved word? It would seem to me that storing the offset or size might account for this. Additionally, a visual examination of the field showed everything was in order. Lastly, some of the methods weren't affected. I'm not debating, BTW, just wondering.