I had a question from one of our analysts asking how good VFP's restoration after a corrupt table was.

This was a comparison to Oracle, in which I responded that VFP's tables would have to be restored via NT's tape drive and didn't have any means of restoring corrupt/damaged files itself, although there are products out there can restore corrupt tables - but I'm not sure how good these are as opposed to Oracles own recovery devices.

Is that incorrect, or is that the bottom line to such a question?

Thanks
Kev