>>>>>>>all the ballots are examined by both sides, and disputed ballots are examined by election officials , usually NOT from the voting district!<<
>>>>>
>>>>>If this is what actually happened I don't think anyone would have a problem with it. But this is not at all what is going on. For example in Miami they are creating new cards, punching them how they see fit, and not allowing the news media in to observe. This thing is totally rigged and I think everyone knows it.
>>>>
>>>>Really? Care to cite a source for you information?
>>>
>>>http://www.nypost.com/campaign2000/16358.htm
>>
>>Great, you have cited an accusation by a Bush spokesperson. Is that all you got? I would really be interested if this is true, but I need a little more to go on. I can cite accusations from Democratic hacks, too, but like accusations from Republican hacks, they aren't worth my time.
>
>If you read the article you see that the Democrats do not deny that they aren't allowing the recount to be observed by outside impartial sources. Please open your mind to reality...

I also noticed this, which you failed to cite:

"Democratic Florida Rep. Peter Deutsch responded by noting, in Broward, that, You have a Republican supervisor of elections who voted unanimously for that position."

>Here is another link, written by an ex-Democrat.
>
>http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=65000648
>
>You can dismiss this as an opinion also, but it clearly points out how Democrats operate.

Why would I dismiss it as an opinion, especially when it appears on an editorial page and cites no facts?