Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Best way to find orphans - seek vs SQL
Message
 
 
À
21/11/2000 12:32:16
Walter Meester
HoogkarspelPays-Bas
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
Divers
Thread ID:
00444141
Message ID:
00444257
Vues:
12
Hi Walter,

Interesting idea. No, both tables don't have filtered indexes, and they have deleted records. What if I set deleted on?
Would your solution work?

Unfortunately, it's not my application, but we can try.

David's idea is also promising. Basically, there are only few orphans or even 0.
I'll try them.

Thanks.

>Nadya,
>
>If your table2 does not contain any deleted records or the join index is filtered for !DELETED(), you may want to try :
>SCAN FOR INDEXSEEK(PropID,.f.,"Table2")
INDEXSEEK does not retrieve records from the table but searches trough the index itself. I can't think of any faster method.
>
>Walter,
>
>
>>Hi everybody,
>>
>>I have Table1 (child) with ~5mln.records and Table2(parent) with ~4mln.records
>>
>>I want to find and cound each record in Table1 key PropID, what doesn't have
>>corresponding record in Table2.
>>
>>Two ways of doing that:
>>scan Table1
>>seek PropID && in Table2
>>if not found()
>>   *** This is an orphan.
>>endif
>>endscan
>>
>>or
>>
>>select PropID from Table1 where PropID not in (select PropID from Table2).
>>
>>Both tables, of course, have indexes on PropID.
>>
>>My question is: what is the fastest way of doing this?
>>Currently we're using method 1 and I have not patience enough to perform test2.
>>
>>What do you think?
>>
>>Thanks in advance.
If it's not broken, fix it until it is.


My Blog
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform