>>>I have been of the assumption that there is little or no gain in performance for Windows 95 with RAM over 64mb. I can't remember where I first heard this. Does anyone know of any proof either for or against this assumption?
>>
>>Hi Evan,
>>
>>At home I have K6-200 PC. About 8 months ago I upgraded RAM from 32MB to 160MB and perfomance went up significantly. I can tell it, especially when I have several applications (IE, OutlExpr) open.
>
>If you reduce the memory to 64megs, is the performance the same?

The problem is how to measure the perfomance. If you give me a clue, I may be able to try it.