>I have been of the assumption that there is little or no gain in performance for Windows 95 with RAM over 64mb. I can't remember where I first heard this. Does anyone know of any proof either for or against this assumption?

Did you try searching the internet?
www.google.com

Start here:
http://www.freespeech.org/Khephra/a/resource.htm


Then, if you want more:

http://bbs.winmag.com/forum/message.asp?forumid=60&messageid=47033&threadid=46464

http://www.winmag.com/windows/winme/final/

http://www.google.com/url?sa=U&start=1&q=http://www.portablelife.com/tips/story/0,1091,2216,00.html&e=747

http://www.google.com/url?sa=U&start=7&q=http://beta.xmicron.com/97_58/msg00750.html&e=747

http://www.orca.bc.ca/win95/faq9.htm

http://www.mackido.com/Dojo/memprotect_MacOS_Win95.html

http://walden.mvp.net/~rymabry/95winfaq.html

http://www.jcn1.com/aaron/memory.htm

http://www.hcs.ndirect.co.uk/win95.htm