>It looked to me like your point _was_ a personal shot.
>
>FWIW, Mike and I never disagreed on anything, I was just reminding him that there was at least one COM+ feature that VFP couldn't do.


Not a personal shot at all. I would expect an MS person to be more knowledgeable about the product. As an MS person, and specifically a VFP person, his knowledge about the product is an issue.

FWIW, as far as what you an Mike agree or disagree about is not in controversy with me. The fact is, Mr. Stewart's response was less than par. He totally side-stepped the issue. FWIW, I really don't care - except to say that your reponse was totally on point, and an MS person totally side-stepped it. I find it tough to sit by and watch that sort of thing. That is what makes me different than most. To me, this is not a spectator sport.

You and I have disagreed at times. Still, you are one of the truly talented people in the community. That is not something you need me to confirm upon you. You have earned that in your own right. You received a lame-ass response. I called the MS-guy on the carpet. I have no agenda or turf to guard here.

You and Mr. Rauh ran circlses around somebody who technically should more about the product than you guys.

Keep up the good work!!! It's your ballgame now!!


Erik... I will most likely be in Dallas the second week of January... Send me an email with you contact info. Lets go out for dinner and drinks!!


To Mr. Stewart......


Don't try and engage these guys in a technical debate, you can't carry their jock straps....< bg >....


< JVP >










< JVP >