>Hi Larry,
>
>>Pure speculation, but maybe the engine that parses the VCX architecture would have to be modified too much because Session class is missing many of the VFP baseclass PEMs.
>
>>It would either be add the necessary PEMs to the Session class (which we don't want) or modify the class designer (which is not necessary and take resources away from other items on the list).
>
>Ah... you mean like .Top, .Left, .Width, .Height etc propeties. However would adding just these few properties significantly reduce lighweightness ?? I don't know. It would be nice if we can get some info from the VFP team what the reason behind this issue is.

Actually, it's more than that. The Class Designer presets some information that isn't done in PRG code. Not only dimesion information, but things like Count for pageframes, commandgroups and optiongroups as well as other things that add to overall memory footprint when instantiated.

It may take more effort than considered profitable to change the way the Class Designer handles things like Session when PRGs are a viable solution now.

>B.T.W. congrats with your MVP title.
>

Thanks, Walter.