>It looked to me like your point _was_ a personal shot.
>
>FWIW, Mike and I never disagreed on anything, I was just reminding him that there was at least one COM+ feature that VFP couldn't do.

I didn't disagree with Mike, either - I felt it was a safe assumption that if I'd interpreted the docs one way, and Mike made a statement that ran directly against that, it would be a safe bet that I'd misinterpreted something; he's probably got a ton of time really exercising the beta even compared to what I've spent reading.

OTOH, I don't disagree with JVP's characterization of some people's actual understanding of the product; I think it is presumptuous of some people to put themselves in the same category of expertise and experience as someone like Mike, but, then, I'm dumb enough to actually trust what MS puts in thier docs...