ANdy,
>>A reference to four counts is exactly what it is. There's no detail of what the four counts are, and the article is an opinion piece. C'mon, Doug, that's not evidence of four counts.
>
>Hi Tamar.
>How many counts does Al Gore need?
Only until he's ahead and then watch the rules change again. The Dems will come out screaming about how Al's ahead and how GW should concede - conveniently forgetting that just prior to that event they were on the opposite side of the fence.
Nothing wrong with being partisan as I mentioned to Chris but this blatant lying really should stop.
>Is it count until the ballots can be manipulated so that I can win?
Yup..
As Stalin said, "It's not who votes that counts but who counts the votes." A philosohpy the Dems seem to have taken to heart here. <g>
>
>Again I voted for Al Gore, I'm beginning to think that was a mistake. Voter errors happens in all elections in every state.
Andy.. It was a mistake. <g>
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.
