>>>And what laws did the Florida Supreme Court change?
>>
>>The date of certification. Remember, courts aren't suppose dto write law. In this case the SUpreme Court of Florida
without being asked inserted itself into the process. Would it have gotten to thewm ? Sure, most likely. Was it appropriate for them to insert themselves? I don't think so.
>>
>
>Doug - they didn't insert themselves. A case was brought before them (after being heard in a lower court), in which the Bush folks argued that the certification date should be upheld (and some other stuff) and the Gore folks argued that the right to recount took precedence. It is absolutely the role of a court to make determinations when two laws are in conflict, which is the case here.
>
>Tamar
Tamar,
Well, we'll just have to disagree then. All the news media I read said that they acted before they were asked to and from where I sit that's an insertion. I do understand that they were going to be asked anyway and all that but they did still act before being asked.
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.