>>>I thought George's and Ed's article is absolutely reliable, so I didn't bother to check in the docs.
>>>
>>>Are they intentional to force lazy readers to make some search? :)
>>
>>And I think they're absolutely reliable :) I didn't see the article but believe somehow they mentioned this and if they didn't it doesn't matter since FSO is a huge subject:)
>>Cetin
>
>
>Hi Cetin,
>
>Actually, I think this subject is important. I already contacted with Carl Warner (cc to George) and tried to contact Ed in private to point to this problem. I really think, since these articles should help readers to understand FSO and WSH concepts, they should be free of errors and typos. Currently, they are not and this really upsets me.
>
>The articles are on www.vfug.org and if you look closely in them, you'll find problems, as I did :(

That's why I never write articles :)
Cetin