>>Sure. Under a contested election, a judge can order a recount anywhere, but under the law, the plaintiff has to prove there was a problem with the machines used to count the votes. This has to be proven in court for each county you want recounted because, obviously, each county uses different technology. Ascertaining a voter's intent where someone actually did not vote for a candidate for particular office is not a valid arguement.
>
>Well, then let's Gore have his day in court.

He is getting it. He is just not being allowed to push through without opposition. If I were to take you to civil court, would you not defend yourself and position as best and as vigorously as you could? If I have possession of the golden goose, and you are trying to take it away via a court battle, I am going to fight you with all the resources I can muster whether it rightfully belongs to me or not as long as its value to me continues to outweigh the costs of the battle.