>>What I'd be interested in is what rationale they used for their decision and what law they based it upon. Overruling Judge Sauls on what grounds?
>
>That's what the legal analysts are poring over right now, these rulings take a little time to sort out...
>
>>I'd hardly call this a home run. <g> Desperation bunt perhaps... <g>
>
>That was an initial quote from CNN - but since then, I heard a better, more precise analogy:
>
>"Gore is behind by one run, in the bottom of the ninth, two outs, bases empty, and two strikes. He just ripped a line-shot triple into the corner! But there's still two outs, and he's still behind by a run..."

Bruce,

Heh.. And Gore wants to change the rules of the game and the some of the umpires are obviously not impartial. <g>

This whole things is incredible. What I find so amazing is the blatant hypocrisy and double standards in the press and other places.

I'd say that unless there is a genuine repentance and turning back to God in this country we're just about finished.