>>>>What I'd be interested in is what rationale they used for their decision and what law they based it upon. Overruling Judge Sauls on what grounds?
>>>
>>>That's what the legal analysts are poring over right now, these rulings take a little time to sort out...
>>>
>>>>I'd hardly call this a home run. <g> Desperation bunt perhaps... <g>
>>>
>>>That was an initial quote from CNN - but since then, I heard a better, more precise analogy:
>>>
>>>"Gore is behind by one run, in the bottom of the ninth, two outs, bases empty, and two strikes. He just ripped a line-shot triple into the corner! But there's still two outs, and he's still behind by a run..."
>>
>>Bruce,
>>
>>Heh.. And Gore wants to change the rules of the game and the some of the umpires are obviously not impartial. <g>
>>
>>This whole things is incredible. What I find so amazing is the blatant hypocrisy and double standards in the press and other places.
>>
>>I'd say that unless there is a genuine repentance and turning back to God in this country we're just about finished.
>
>Who's God would that be, Doug?
Chris,
Yours and mine - whether you choose to acknowledge Him or not.
Best,
DD
A man is no fool who gives up that which he cannot keep for that which he cannot lose.
Everything I don't understand must be easy!
The difficulty of any task is measured by the capacity of the agent performing the work.