>
>I see, that I have to reply here.
>1. English is not my native language and probably many people here saw this before (I used to participate in UT actively enough).
>2. UT is international forum and someone's poor English is not a reason for personal insults.
>3. Just to 'decypher' my previous message: I tried to say the same things as Jim and Matt in regard to SQL-syntax.

OK Rich, you want some help wiping that egg off your face? :)

Let's all lighten up a bit. I think we can all agree that:

1) VFP 3.0 and 5.0 are buggy.
2) Bill Gates is an a****le.
3) VFP SQL is not ANSI compliant.
4) MS seems to be inconsistent in supporting us.
5) The English language is about as buggy as VFP 3.0 and VFP 5.0
6) At least once a week, we all ask ourselves how the hell we got mixed up with FoxPro.
7) Michel Fourier is a demi-god for having created the UT.

We're all in the same trench, as Jim put it. Let's ignore each other's differences and attitudes and just continue to work together to create great code. No other programming community has a forum this advanced (yet). Let's make the most of our advantage so that we can squelch all the fears of VFP's slow death.

JMHO (yeah, right...humble...that's me)