>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>If this were true, it would kind of make sense. Which would you think to be more stable, a "ground up" compiler, or a compiler that's been cobbled to fit a new paradigm?
>>>
>>>Hmmm, its a paradox!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
>>No, Paradox was Fox competitor way back... {GD&R}
>
>Is Mike old enough to get that joke? He was probably about 12 the last time Paradox was a serious competitor! <g>
>
> - della
>>>>>>>>>>>>

You are right! Silly me! I've done that kind of mistake before so I don't want to sound like a broken record! Wait! A "broken record"? What's a record? And how can it be broken? {GD&R}